As the first step in the decommissioning of the site has been converted to read-only mode.

Here are some tips for How to share your SAS knowledge with your professional network.

Difference between revisions of "Talk:Main Page"

From sasCommunity
Jump to: navigation, search
(Undo revision 56682 by Nicolekristen (talk) This looks like a rather sophisticated search engine optimisation exercise and is the third posting of this text by this user on this wiki.)
Line 76: Line 76:
::I'll work on it in my spare time; easy to do. -- [[User:CharlieShipp|Charlie Shipp]] ([[User talk:CharlieShipp|talk]]) 15:06, 23 June 2015 (CDT)
::I'll work on it in my spare time; easy to do. -- [[User:CharlieShipp|Charlie Shipp]] ([[User talk:CharlieShipp|talk]]) 15:06, 23 June 2015 (CDT)
== Look at SAS Business Intelligence versus SAP Crystal Reports ==
In the event that you need a simple approach to discover which Business Intelligence Software item is better, our selective technique gives SAP Crystal Reports a score of 8.8 and SAS Business Intelligence a score of 8.7 for add up to quality and execution. Besides, [ '''SAP Crystal Reports'''] is evaluated at 98%, while SAS Business Intelligence is appraised 98% for their client fulfillment level. You can likewise look at their item points of interest, including capacities, devices, alternatives, plans, expenses, and substantially more. See if the arrangement can modify at any rate some portion of its work processes to guarantee the product coordinates your own business forms. We know that not all organizations have room schedule-wise to experiment with a substantial number of various administrations, so we arranged a rundown of recommendations that you may discover helpful. Our best decisions for the Business Intelligence Software classification are: Looker, GoodData, Sisense.

Latest revision as of 14:52, 29 August 2017

This page is to discuss the content of the Main Page. (Off topic postings get removed.)

Closed discussions

Registered trademark symbol

Shouldn't the little "R" in a circle appear in banner_text.gif and in the first text reference? funct

Search function

It would be nice if the SEARCH function were visible more toward the top of the main page, so that it would be easier to find when someone just viewed the main page --Hamer 11:45, 17 March 2008 (EDT)


How about putting CATEGORIES as a selection on the left menu?--Nancy 13:13, 17 March 2008 (EDT)

Hierarchical structure

Since a Wiki is self-configurable (I mean that we the users can do what we want to it, without waiting for a webmaster to do it for us), that should mean that if we the users wish, we could impose a hierarcical structure on it in order to make it easier to navigate it, but of course, users would not have to use the hierarchary, but of course, gardners could move things around. --Hamer 15:51, 17 March 2008 (EDT)

About Category

I agree with Nancy in putting the 'category' item on the main menu. To find categories now, I looked at 'tool box-> special pages'. I'm not sure how one would update the main menu, so it may be something that admin folks can do. --CJ 15:44, 3 June 2008 (EDT)

Hi! I just am learning (stumbling) my way around. Hi Bob! Is there a way just to respond to you from here about the little "R" or is the way to respond the way I'm doing now with edit? A little bit of hand holding and then I will take off... Sally Muller.

This was answered/addressed on Where did Hamer go?‎. --Don Henderson 22:07, 17 March 2009 (EDT)

Employment opportunities

Please go to the Employment opportunities page to list any employment opportunities. If you list your employment opportunity here it will not be registered. - Cameron 22:21, 25 September 2012 (EDT)

Removed topics

Here is where some recently removed topics have gone. View history for more details. - Cameron (talk) 21:35, 29 April 2017 (CDT)

Towards a tidy talk page

I think this talk page needs to be tidier. The page should be a discussion about the content of the Main Page, rather than a public forum.

  • Questions from users seeking help should be moved to the respective user's talk page if a response is provided, rather than being left here.
  • Users listing employment opportunities should be directed to list there instead.
  • Ideas, suggestions and general comments about the sasCommunity should be moved to a more relevant wiki page.
  • Old comments and discussion should be moved to an archive area once they are no longer relevant.
  • The remaining discussion(s) should be refactored.

- Cameron (talk) 00:12, 29 April 2017 (CDT)

Good points Cameron, you have the experience, would you like to take a stab at it? --Art Carpenter (talk) 02:35, 29 April 2017 (CDT)
I have already made a start by moving several sections to users talk pages. Though it looks like an edit conflict has just undone some of the changes I have made here recently, so that might mean I need to repeat a little bit of work. - Cameron (talk) 02:51, 29 April 2017 (CDT)
The talk page is a bit tidier now. - Cameron (talk) 19:53, 29 April 2017 (CDT)

About Weekend Wiki Work/TIPs

I'm noticing that a daily tip was not available for today. . . . What about having a weekend wiki study assignment (HomeWork as it were.) For example here is one:

 Use the 'edit' on any Article-Page to see how the wiki language-controls are written.
 Look for examples of good page publishing and use 'edit' to see how it is done.

Some weekend wiki work (homework) could involve longer study assignments (for Fri-PM, Sat, and Sun.), from those that are doing so well assigned to eager students such as myself. Humbly, Charlie Shipp
Charlie Shipp 00:04, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

Sounds good, Charlie! Use the 'submit a tip' process to submit your tip, and it can be scheduled.--Nancy 15:00, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

I'll work on it in my spare time; easy to do. -- Charlie Shipp (talk) 15:06, 23 June 2015 (CDT)